I’m wondering about this “new” theory that is life-changing—the two little words that people can’t stop talking about that Mel Robbins is probably going to make millions on.
Full disclosure: I haven’t read the book, so I’m not a reliable source. I’ve only read about the book, and those reports were pretty clearly at maybe a fifth-grade level.
You know what I’m talking about, I’m sure: Let Them. The theory that “will forever change the way you think about relationships, control, and personal power.” Or, you could essentially learn the Serenity Prayer and apply it to your everyday life.
In my day it was “Don’t Let the Bastards Grind You Down.”
Hundreds, maybe thousands of self-help books have broached the subject of living your best life by not allowing others to occupy your thoughts. You’d think we would have it by now. So why don’t we? Maybe because we’re social creatures and we need other people. And that need translates to caring what they think about us. Duh. Can we fight against that? Of course. Will we win? The jury is still out.
Toxic people have been identified as bad for us, and we’ve been warned to weed them out and not allow their energy to defeat us. Check. Narcissists are to be avoided at all costs. Check. Friends who criticize rather than propping us up are not really friends. Check. And on and on—ever since someone saw a way to make money by selling us on the next best idea to change your life for the better.
There’s nothing wrong with the book or the ideas in the book—in fact it’s all good advice that’s been re-marketed into a catchy two-word philosophy. Is it “ancient wisdom”? Perhaps. I bet some Tibetan monk had it nailed centuries ago. Is it science-backed? It is if it helps people. How can it be a bad thing? It can’t, not really. It’s just that Let Them is so obviously simplistic.
If you believe that you actually have no control over the actions of others, then you’re already most of the way there. I’m going to suggest that sometimes you can influence the behavior of others, especially the “others” who admire you or who believe you to be wise or at least to care about them. And vise versa. People you care about can influence your behaviour, too. Maybe that’s why people feel the need to buy a book written by a person with such impressive credentials. So she can influence your behavior? Do I sense some irony, here.
If you don’t embrace Let Them, does that mean you’re liable to slide back into caring what others think of you? Will you still compare yourself and find yourself wanting and/or happy to be better off? Probably. We have to fight that impulse every day. Because of that whole social animal thing we have. Remember no man is an island? The sum of the parts? Problems solved is a problem shared? Teamwork saves the day? Shall I go on? Okay, not.
People matter to us. Watch any person separated from their people. They will look and look, expressionless. Then they see their person. Big smile. Relief is visible. Hugs, laughter. Connections comfort us. Those same connections complicate our lives and cause certain people to write books helping us to not get sucked into unhealthy connections. I don’t wish anyone ill will; certainly not a writer. Writing is hard work, darn it. Taking a simple concept—love yourself—and stretching it out over x number of words on x number of pages (I told you I hadn’t read it) might be hard, too.
After all, I spent over 600 words pondering that simple concept.
I’d love to hear your take. I’ll even Let You.
Author: patponderslife
A movie I saw . . .
I have seen but one of the Academy Awards nominees this year and, oddly, it’s Anora. If you’re easilly offended by graphic sexual content or strong language, don’t bother. I’m not, exactly (offended easily, that is), but I don’t love it, and sometimes I feel as if it’s there for shock value. Not with this film. It’s a portrait of an event in the life of an exotic dancer/stripper/prostitute, something I have zero experience with, and (I’ll admit it) before I saw the movie, little curiosity about. Okay, so not entirely true. Ages ago, I and a couple of other gals took my sister-in-law to a male strip show for her fortieth birthday because that’s where she wanted to go. We were probably a little embarassed and trying not to show it. We drank and laughed and squealed and put dollar bills (I said it was a long time ago, okay?) into the g-strings of the sweaty, smiling guys dancing on stage. I think my sister-in-law had fun, or at least she wasn’t disappointed, and that was the point, but I never repeated the experience, and me, being me, I ended up thinking about those guys and wondering how many of them were okay with what they were doing and how they felt and what they thought about those silly women in the audience. I’m burdened/gifted with an abundance of empathy, so I often wonder about stuff like that.
But I digress.
Back to the movie: One night Anora “entertains” Ivan, a young man who likes her enough to ask her to be exclusive with him for a week, which she agrees to for $1,500. It’s a week of perfunctory sex (but lots of it), parties with many anonymous hanger-ons, mountains of drugs, loud music, more sex, most of it at the absurdly oppulent mansion of this manchild’s parents who are Russian oligarchs. Impulsively, Ivan asks Anora to marry him. He says it’s so he can stay in the USA and won’t have to return to Russia. Once she sees that he means it, she agrees. We can see hope in her eyes. We can see that she warms to the idea of an escape from her life with this proposal, something we have the sinking feeling will never happen. Sure enough, when Mommy and Daddy find out, they … well, no need to spoil it for you, if by any remote chance you ever see the film.
The ending of the movie is powerful. Stunning, even. And it gave me something to ponder. To that end, I looked up what had been said about it, and one of the movie critics whose job it is to interpret works of art caught my eye. I’ll degress one more time and say lots of people who watch Anora won’t agree about the label “art,” and I respect that but don’t have a desire or any credentials to debate it. Anyway, his thesis in my words is this: (more or less) the minions—us, I assume–are shuffling along behind and catering to the unpredictable needs and wants of the rich and powerful while they don’t see us, which serves to demonstrate the growing reality of inequality and shows us with painful clarity that we can never be them and that they will never see us. The gap is huge.
He goes on, but even though I saw what he was saying, I couldn’t help but relate to–of all people–the parents. Sure it was easy to see that Anora’s life was empty and that she hoped beyond hope that she could get lucky and change it, but the odds weren’t in her favor. She was one of the minions, after all. But at one point she yelled (there’s lots of yelling) at Ivan that he hated his parents. Something so obviously true smacked me in the face with its honesty. I thought, How terrible to be hated by your child. It must be the cruelest blow of all. When would I ever have a chance to use that empathy of mine to relate to a person so wealthy as to be in the multiple mansions, private jets, people following them around wating to do their bidding rich? Ridiculous wealth. We might as well live on different planets.
Still, they were parents, right? They’d given and given and indulged this feckless child who had never done anything in his life to make them anything but worried, perplexed, and exasperated. They’d bailed him out countless times. There was nothing they wouldn’t do for him, and he hated them for it. Why? Because what all this gifting proved to him was that his parents didn’t believe in him. They had no faith that he could do anything or be anything if tested by the everyday standards that the minions were tested. His parents had failed him and knew it but didn’t know how to fix it except to throw more money at him. He’s their child and he hates them.
What parent doesn’t worry that they will fail/are failing/have failed their child? Well, okay, there surely are some, but I’m pretty sure I’ve tapped into a common feeling shared by rich and poor alike. By people from different cultures, different ethnicity, different in multiple ways. People (parents, anyway) who might disagree about abandoning daylight savings time, consuming meat products, or even Donald Trump, I bet would agree that they worry about whether they are good parents.
There were lots of universal themes in Anora–some I understood at an intellectual level, some I probably missed–but that one was easy for me. I didn’t like either of Ivan’s parents, but I felt bad for them. Who wouldn’t?
